This question uses experimental data to estimate outcomes over a larger number of trials.
Use experimental results as an estimate, then scale them proportionally.
At Higher GCSE level, relative frequency is often used to move beyond simple calculation and into prediction. Instead of only describing what has already happened, you are asked to use experimental data to estimate what might happen if the experiment were repeated on a larger scale. This skill combines probability with proportional reasoning.
Relative frequency measures how often a particular outcome occurs compared to the total number of trials. Because it is based on observed data, it provides an experimental estimate of probability. This estimate can then be used to predict future outcomes, especially when theoretical probability may not reflect real behaviour.
When using relative frequency to predict outcomes in a larger number of trials, follow these steps:
A spinner is spun 40 times and lands on blue 17 times. The relative frequency of blue is calculated and then multiplied by 200 to estimate how many times blue would appear in 200 spins.
A dice is rolled 60 times and lands on an odd number 31 times. The relative frequency of rolling an odd number is used to estimate how many odd numbers might appear in 300 rolls.
A survey shows that 22 out of 50 people prefer tea to coffee. This relative frequency is scaled up to estimate how many people in a group of 400 might prefer tea.
Predictions based on relative frequency are not exact. Random variation means that results can change when an experiment is repeated. However, relative frequency still provides a reasonable estimate, especially when the number of trials is large.
In many real-life situations, objects are not perfectly fair, or the probability is unknown. In these cases, experimental probability gives a better picture of what is likely to happen. This approach is widely used in science, economics, sports analysis, and quality control.
Should I always use relative frequency for predictions?
Yes, when the question tells you to base your answer on experimental results.
Does a larger original sample help?
Yes. Larger samples usually give more reliable estimates.
Why not just repeat the experiment?
Repeating experiments is ideal, but predictions are often needed before more data is available.
In Higher GCSE questions, words such as "estimate", "predict", or "how many times would you expect" indicate that you should calculate relative frequency and then scale it to the required number of trials.
Enjoyed this question?