This Higher-level question tests experimental probability using a large number of die rolls.
Always calculate experimental probability using observed results rather than expected outcomes.
Experimental probability is determined using results collected from repeated trials rather than predictions made before an experiment. In Higher GCSE Maths, students are expected to interpret experimental probability using large data sets and understand how these results compare with theoretical expectations. Rolling a die hundreds of times provides a clear example of how randomness behaves over many trials.
Experimental probability = number of times the event occurs ÷ total number of trials
This formula always relies on observed data. The resulting probability can be expressed as a fraction, a decimal, or a percentage, depending on the requirements of the question.
A die is rolled 360 times and the number 3 appears 68 times. The experimental probability of rolling a 3 is:
\( \frac{68}{360} = \frac{17}{90} \)
This value comes directly from the experiment and does not assume that each face appears an equal number of times.
Theoretical probability is calculated using equally likely outcomes. For a fair die, each face has a theoretical probability of one sixth. Experimental probability, however, is based on what actually happens during an experiment and may differ slightly because of randomness.
With very large numbers of trials, experimental probability often moves closer to theoretical probability, but it does not have to match it exactly.
In small experiments, random variation can cause large fluctuations in results. As the number of trials increases, these fluctuations usually become smaller, and the results become more stable. This principle is closely related to the law of large numbers, which explains why larger samples tend to give more reliable estimates.
However, even very large samples will still show some variation, as randomness can never be completely removed.
Experimental probability using large data sets is widely applied in real-world situations. Engineers repeatedly test components to estimate failure rates. Scientists perform experiments many times to check reliability. Game developers simulate large numbers of dice rolls to test fairness.
In all cases, decisions are based on collected evidence rather than assumptions.
Does experimental probability become exact with more trials?
No. It usually becomes more stable, but randomness always remains.
Can experimental probability be written as a decimal?
Yes. Fractions, decimals, and percentages are all acceptable unless the question states otherwise.
Why is this considered a Higher-tier topic?
Because it involves interpreting large data sets and understanding variation.
When working with very large numbers of trials, always form the fraction first, simplify it completely, and only then convert to a decimal if required.
Enjoyed this question?