This question focuses on calculating relative frequency using observed results from repeated trials.
Relative frequency always uses observed data, not the contents of the bag.
Relative frequency is an important idea in GCSE Maths probability because it is based on real observations rather than predictions. Instead of calculating how likely something should be using theory, relative frequency looks at what actually happened during an experiment or repeated trial.
Relative frequency tells us how often a particular outcome occurs compared to the total number of times an experiment is carried out. It is found using results that have already been observed. This makes it especially useful in experiments, surveys, and situations where data is collected over time.
The method for calculating relative frequency is always the same:
A spinner is spun 30 times. It lands on yellow 12 times. To find the relative frequency of landing on yellow, divide the number of yellow results by the total number of spins. This gives a fraction that can be simplified.
A dice is rolled 40 times. The number 6 appears 10 times. The relative frequency of rolling a 6 is calculated by comparing the number of sixes to the total number of rolls.
A student tracks how many days it rains over a 25-day period and records rain on 8 days. The relative frequency of a rainy day is found by dividing the number of rainy days by the total number of days observed.
Relative frequency is widely used in real life. Weather forecasts use past data to estimate future conditions, sports analysts use match statistics to assess performance, and scientists rely on repeated experiments to draw conclusions. In all of these cases, the probability is based on observation rather than theory.
Does relative frequency change?
Yes. As more trials are carried out, the relative frequency can change and often becomes more stable.
Can relative frequency be written as a decimal or percentage?
Yes. After finding the fraction, it can be converted into a decimal or percentage if required.
Is relative frequency always accurate?
It is an estimate based on results. Larger numbers of trials usually give more reliable estimates.
If a GCSE question mentions words like observed, recorded, or experiment, it is a strong sign that you should use relative frequency rather than theoretical probability.
Enjoyed this question?